SHRI PARTH EDUCATION TRUST vs SHREE PARTH ACADEMY Advocate - R.L.HIRPARA — 1/2019
Case under Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 27(2). Status: HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
TMSUIT - TRADE MARK SUIT
CNR: GJJN210007512019
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2019
Filing Date
23-07-2019
Registration No
1/2019
Registration Date
23-07-2019
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD
Judge
2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI PARTH EDUCATION TRUST
Adv. H.D.PUROHIT
PARTH ACADEMY, JUNAGADH
Adv. H.D.PUROHIT
Respondent(s)
SHREE PARTH ACADEMY Advocate - R.L.HIRPARA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 30-01-2026 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 26-12-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 21-11-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION | |
| 10-10-2025 | HEARING ON INJUNCTION APPLICATION |
Interim Orders
Summary: The interim injunction application filed by Shri Parth Education Trust and Parth Academy under the Trademark Act was allowed. The court restrained the defendant (Shree Parth Academy) from using the word "Parth" or any deceptively similar trademark in marketing, advertising, or providing educational services until the suit's conclusion. The court found that the plaintiff established a prime facie case of passing off, demonstrated balance of convenience in its favor, and would suffer irreparable harm without the injunction, as the plaintiff was the prior user of the "Parth Academy" mark since 2004. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The interim injunction application filed by Shri Parth Education Trust and Parth Academy under the Trademark Act was allowed. The court restrained the defendant (Shree Parth Academy) from using the word "Parth" or any deceptively similar trademark in marketing, advertising, or providing educational services until the suit's conclusion. The court found that the plaintiff established a prime facie case of passing off, demonstrated balance of convenience in its favor, and would suffer irreparable harm without the injunction, as the plaintiff was the prior user of the "Parth Academy" mark since 2004. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts