JAYSHREEBEN W/O KANABHAI DAKI vs LATE KANABHAI RAMSHIBHAI DAKI Advocate - B L SINDHAVA — 45/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 10th April 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJJN210007232025

Case disposed

Filing Number

45/2025

Filing Date

28-05-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

28-05-2025

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD

Judge

1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 438,440

Petitioner(s)

JAYSHREEBEN W/O KANABHAI DAKI

Adv. D K PARMAR

MINOR VANDANA D/O KANABHAI DAKI

Respondent(s)

LATE KANABHAI RAMSHIBHAI DAKI Advocate - B L SINDHAVA

RAMSHIBHAI VARJANGBHAI DAKI

Adv. B L SINDHAVA

HITESHBHAI RAMSHIBHAI DAKI

Adv. B L SINDHAVA

VALIBEN RAMSHIBHAI DAKI

Adv. B L SINDHAVA

BHAVANABEN RAMSHIBHAI DAKI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

10-04-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

HEARING

27-02-2026

HEARING

13-02-2026

HEARING

31-01-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Jayshreeben (widow) and minor daughter Vandana against in-laws under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, finding no evidence of domestic violence or grounds to grant maintenance. The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, noting that maintenance claims by a widow against in-laws are limited to specific circumstances under Section 19 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, and that the petitioner failed to prove such eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by Jayshreeben (widow) and minor daughter Vandana against in-laws under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, finding no evidence of domestic violence or grounds to grant maintenance. The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, noting that maintenance claims by a widow against in-laws are limited to specific circumstances under Section 19 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, and that the petitioner failed to prove such eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case