Government of Gujarat vs HAJI MAJAR SAMA(Name quashed from charge-sheet/complaint) Advocate - R G DHULA — 16/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 328,379,411. Status: EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJJN210004532020

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Next Hearing

25th June 2026

Filing Number

16/2020

Filing Date

09-11-2020

Registration No

16/2020

Registration Date

09-11-2020

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD

Judge

2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

10

Police Station

CHORWAD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2019

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 328,379,411

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. A M PAREKH

Respondent(s)

HAJI MAJAR SAMA(Name quashed from charge-sheet/complaint) Advocate - R G DHULA

RAMESHKUMAR KUSHAJI PRAJAPATI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

21-05-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

23-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Interim Orders

12-09-2023
ORDER

Summary of Case 16/2020 The Gujarat court convicted accused Haji Uded Manjar Hasan under IPC Sections 338, 337, and 411 for voluntarily causing hurt and criminal breach of trust. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment for specified periods under each section and imposed fines. The court also ordered the accused to pay compensation and directed that the case be disposed of accordingly with the sentence to run concurrently where applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 16/2020 The Gujarat court convicted accused Haji Uded Manjar Hasan under IPC Sections 338, 337, and 411 for voluntarily causing hurt and criminal breach of trust. The court sentenced the accused to imprisonment for specified periods under each section and imposed fines. The court also ordered the accused to pay compensation and directed that the case be disposed of accordingly with the sentence to run concurrently where applicable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case