HEIRS OF DECEASED AKASH RAMABHAI PARMAR ( vs BHARATBHAI RAMBHAI PARMAR — 8/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th April 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJJN210003492024
Filing Number
8/2024
Filing Date
03-04-2024
Registration No
8/2024
Registration Date
03-04-2024
Court
ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD
Judge
2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
08th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEIRS OF DECEASED AKASH RAMABHAI PARMAR (
RAMABHAI PITHABHAI PARMAR
Adv. K L SANCHELA
LAXMIBEN RAMABHAI PARMAR
Adv. K L SANCHELA
Respondent(s)
BHARATBHAI RAMBHAI PARMAR
THE BAJAJ GENERAL INS. CO. LTD.
Adv. V S JETHAVA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
APPLICANTS EVIDENCE
APPLICANTS EVIDENCE
APPLICANTS EVIDENCE
APPLICANTS EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | APPLICANTS EVIDENCE |
| 04-02-2026 | APPLICANTS EVIDENCE |
| 07-01-2026 | APPLICANTS EVIDENCE |
| 24-12-2025 | APPLICANTS EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the compensation claim filed by the heirs of 19-year-old Aakash Ramabhai Parmar (who died in a motorcycle accident on 22/02/2024) against the vehicle owner and insurance company. The court held that since the deceased was driving a borrowed motorcycle and no other vehicle was involved, he "stepped into the shoes of the owner" and thus cannot be classified as a "Third Party" under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, making the claim under Section 164 unmaintainable against the insurer's "Liability Only" policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the compensation claim filed by the heirs of 19-year-old Aakash Ramabhai Parmar (who died in a motorcycle accident on 22/02/2024) against the vehicle owner and insurance company. The court held that since the deceased was driving a borrowed motorcycle and no other vehicle was involved, he "stepped into the shoes of the owner" and thus cannot be classified as a "Third Party" under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, making the claim under Section 164 unmaintainable against the insurer's "Liability Only" policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts