HEIRS OF DECEASED AKASH RAMABHAI PARMAR ( vs BHARATBHAI RAMBHAI PARMAR — 8/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 08th April 2026.

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJJN210003492024

Case disposed

Filing Number

8/2024

Filing Date

03-04-2024

Registration No

8/2024

Registration Date

03-04-2024

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD

Judge

2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

08th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 164

Petitioner(s)

HEIRS OF DECEASED AKASH RAMABHAI PARMAR (

RAMABHAI PITHABHAI PARMAR

Adv. K L SANCHELA

LAXMIBEN RAMABHAI PARMAR

Adv. K L SANCHELA

Respondent(s)

BHARATBHAI RAMBHAI PARMAR

THE BAJAJ GENERAL INS. CO. LTD.

Adv. V S JETHAVA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE

08-04-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

APPLICANTS EVIDENCE

04-02-2026

APPLICANTS EVIDENCE

07-01-2026

APPLICANTS EVIDENCE

24-12-2025

APPLICANTS EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

08-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the compensation claim filed by the heirs of 19-year-old Aakash Ramabhai Parmar (who died in a motorcycle accident on 22/02/2024) against the vehicle owner and insurance company. The court held that since the deceased was driving a borrowed motorcycle and no other vehicle was involved, he "stepped into the shoes of the owner" and thus cannot be classified as a "Third Party" under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, making the claim under Section 164 unmaintainable against the insurer's "Liability Only" policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dismissed the compensation claim filed by the heirs of 19-year-old Aakash Ramabhai Parmar (who died in a motorcycle accident on 22/02/2024) against the vehicle owner and insurance company. The court held that since the deceased was driving a borrowed motorcycle and no other vehicle was involved, he "stepped into the shoes of the owner" and thus cannot be classified as a "Third Party" under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, making the claim under Section 164 unmaintainable against the insurer's "Liability Only" policy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case