ASHARF KALEKHA GULDI vs Government of Gujarat — 80/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN210002052026

Case disposed

Filing Number

80/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

80/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD

Judge

1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203012260054

Police Station

CHORWAD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

ASHARF KALEKHA GULDI

Adv. R V BHALGARIYA

Respondent(s)

Government of Gujarat

Hearing History

Judge: 1-2nd ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

20-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

12-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Ashraf Kalekha Guldi v. Government of Gujarat (Cr. M.A. No. 80/2026) The court rejected the regular bail application of Ashraf Kalekha Guldi, accused in a group assault case involving seven perpetrators. The applicant allegedly assaulted the complainant and snatched a golden chain; the stolen chain remains unrecovered and four co-accused are still unidentified. The judge found that the applicant initiated the affray, possesses prior criminal record, and fails to qualify for bail under the parity principle, determining substantial risk of re-offending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ashraf Kalekha Guldi v. Government of Gujarat (Cr. M.A. No. 80/2026) The court rejected the regular bail application of Ashraf Kalekha Guldi, accused in a group assault case involving seven perpetrators. The applicant allegedly assaulted the complainant and snatched a golden chain; the stolen chain remains unrecovered and four co-accused are still unidentified. The judge found that the applicant initiated the affray, possesses prior criminal record, and fails to qualify for bail under the parity principle, determining substantial risk of re-offending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case