ASHARF KALEKHA GULDI vs Government of Gujarat — 80/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN210002052026

Filing Number

80/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

80/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD

Judge

1-2nd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203012260054

Police Station

CHORWAD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHARF KALEKHA GULDI

    Adv. R V BHALGARIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: Ashraf Kalekha Guldi v. Government of Gujarat (Cr. M.A. No. 80/2026) The court rejected the regular bail application of Ashraf Kalekha Guldi, accused in a group assault case involving seven perpetrators. The applicant allegedly assaulted the complainant and snatched a golden chain; the stolen chain remains unrecovered and four co-accused are still unidentified. The judge found that the applicant initiated the affray, possesses prior criminal record, and fails to qualify for bail under the parity principle, determining substantial risk of re-offending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Addl District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    2nd Addl District Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 80/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Ashraf Kalekha Guldi v. Government of Gujarat (Cr. M.A. No. 80/2026) The court rejected the regular bail application of Ashraf Kalekha Guldi, accused in a group assault case involving seven perpetrators. The applicant allegedly assaulted the complainant and snatched a golden chain; the stolen chain remains unrecovered and four co-accused are still unidentified. The judge found that the applicant initiated the affray, possesses prior criminal record, and fails to qualify for bail under the parity principle, determining substantial risk of re-offending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case