HAJABHAI ALIAS HIRENBHAI DHARNANTBHAI PITHIYA vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT — 76/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN210001782026

Filing Number

75/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

76/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT-KESHOD

Judge

2-Addl. District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250010

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAJABHAI ALIAS HIRENBHAI DHARNANTBHAI PITHIYA

    Adv. D K PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - N K PUROHIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: CrMA No. 76/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the petitioner Hajabhai's plea for regular bail/anticipatory bail in this criminal case involving charges of breach of trust and cheating under the Indian Penal Code. The court found the accusations credible: the petitioner received a vehicle (truck) from the complainant for commercial purposes but misappropriated it and failed to account for earnings or return the vehicle. The court also noted the petitioner's evasive behavior, including changing phone numbers and lack of cooperation, demonstrating consciousness of guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 76/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CrMA No. 76/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected the petitioner Hajabhai's plea for regular bail/anticipatory bail in this criminal case involving charges of breach of trust and cheating under the Indian Penal Code. The court found the accusations credible: the petitioner received a vehicle (truck) from the complainant for commercial purposes but misappropriated it and failed to account for earnings or return the vehicle. The court also noted the petitioner's evasive behavior, including changing phone numbers and lack of cooperation, demonstrating consciousness of guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case