NAGJIBHAI NARANBHAI MARU vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 55/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 33. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJJN200004892025
Filing Number
55/2025
Filing Date
17-Nov-2025
Registration No
55/2025
Registration Date
17-Nov-2025
Court
Additional Court, Visavadar
Judge
1-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NAGJIBHAI NARANBHAI MARU
Adv. D N CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Judegement
Summary The 4th Additional District Judge, Visavadar allowed Nagjibhai Naranbhai Maru's application to file a Motor Accident Claim Petition (₹15,00,000) as an indigent person, finding he lacks sufficient means to pay court fees. The court held that financial inability cannot bar access to justice, and since the opponent failed to produce contrary evidence challenging the applicant's sworn statement of poverty, the application was granted with court fees to be recovered later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
4th Addl District Judge
-
09-Mar-2026
Urgent Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Urgent Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Notice To Opponents
4th Addl District Judge
-
26-Dec-2025
Notice To Opponents
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
Notice To Opponents
4th Addl District Judge
-
17-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2025
Summary The 4th Additional District Judge, Visavadar allowed Nagjibhai Naranbhai Maru's application to file a Motor Accident Claim Petition (₹15,00,000) as an indigent person, finding he lacks sufficient means to pay court fees. The court held that financial inability cannot bar access to justice, and since the opponent failed to produce contrary evidence challenging the applicant's sworn statement of poverty, the application was granted with court fees to be recovered later. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts