DARSHAN AS KANO BHIKHUBHAI AMIPARA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 54/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN200001142026
Filing Number
54/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
54/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Additional Court, Visavadar
Judge
1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203070250509
Police Station
VISAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DARSHAN AS KANO BHIKHUBHAI AMIPARA
Adv. K B JOSHI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
ORDER
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | ORDER |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court granted bail to the accused under Section 438 CrPC, modifying the earlier order dated 13-11-2025 that had rejected the bail application. The court found that while the accused faced serious charges under IPC Sections 109, 115, 296, 351, 54, and JP Act Section 135, the investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, and considering the accused's age (23 years), lack of prior criminal history, agricultural background, and family support, bail was warranted. The court imposed standard bail conditions and directed the accused to furnish bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court granted bail to the accused under Section 438 CrPC, modifying the earlier order dated 13-11-2025 that had rejected the bail application. The court found that while the accused faced serious charges under IPC Sections 109, 115, 296, 351, 54, and JP Act Section 135, the investigation was complete, chargesheet filed, and considering the accused's age (23 years), lack of prior criminal history, agricultural background, and family support, bail was warranted. The court imposed standard bail conditions and directed the accused to furnish bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts