DHIRENBHAI AS DK AMRUTLAL KARIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 53/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS
CNR: GJJN200001122026
Filing Number
53/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
53/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Additional Court, Visavadar
Judge
1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203007250351
Police Station
BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHIRENBHAI AS DK AMRUTLAL KARIYA
Adv. J R JOSHI
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 12-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In this Criminal Revision Miscellaneous Application (CRMA S/53/2026) from the Gujarat High Court, the court rejected the accused's petition seeking bail on personal bonds. The court held that the accused, being the main accused in a drug trafficking case with a serious criminal history involving 63 registered offenses and involvement in organized international drug smuggling since 2015, does not qualify for bail on personal recognizance. The court emphasized that the accused's criminal antecedents, the gravity of charges under the IPC and drug laws, and the pattern of offenses make him unsuitable for release on the grounds sought, and therefore directed that the bail application be dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this Criminal Revision Miscellaneous Application (CRMA S/53/2026) from the Gujarat High Court, the court rejected the accused's petition seeking bail on personal bonds. The court held that the accused, being the main accused in a drug trafficking case with a serious criminal history involving 63 registered offenses and involvement in organized international drug smuggling since 2015, does not qualify for bail on personal recognizance. The court emphasized that the accused's criminal antecedents, the gravity of charges under the IPC and drug laws, and the pattern of offenses make him unsuitable for release on the grounds sought, and therefore directed that the bail application be dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts