RASIDABEN W/O RAFIKBHAI LAKHA D/O GULABBHAI JUMABHAI AAGHA DAFER vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 49/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN200000922026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

49/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

49/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Additional Court, Visavadar

Judge

1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 108,54,

Petitioner(s)

RASIDABEN W/O RAFIKBHAI LAKHA D/O GULABBHAI JUMABHAI AAGHA DAFER

Adv. K B JOSHI

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK

Hearing History

Judge: 1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

ORDER

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Visavadar, rejected the bail applications of Roshanben and Rasidaben, who were arrested for alleged harassment leading to a woman's suicide under sections 108 and 54 of the BNS, 2023. The court found prima facie involvement of the accused based on specific allegations in the FIR and declined bail due to the serious nature of charges, the preliminary stage of investigation, and concerns that the applicants might influence witnesses or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Visavadar, rejected the bail applications of Roshanben and Rasidaben, who were arrested for alleged harassment leading to a woman's suicide under sections 108 and 54 of the BNS, 2023. The court found prima facie involvement of the accused based on specific allegations in the FIR and declined bail due to the serious nature of charges, the preliminary stage of investigation, and concerns that the applicants might influence witnesses or tamper with evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional Court, Visavadar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case