ROSHANBEN AS RAJUBEN GULABBHAI JUMABHAI AAGHA DAFER vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 48/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN200000912026

Filing Number

48/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

48/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Additional Court, Visavadar

Judge

1-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 108,54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ROSHANBEN AS RAJUBEN GULABBHAI JUMABHAI AAGHA DAFER

    Adv. K B JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary: The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Visavadar rejected bail applications filed by two women (Roshanben and Rasidaben) accused under sections 108 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, related to a complainant's daughter's suicide allegedly caused by harassment. The court found prima facie involvement of the accused based on specific allegations in the FIR, and considering the serious nature of charges, preliminary investigation stage, and risk of witness intimidation or evidence tampering, it declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 48/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Visavadar rejected bail applications filed by two women (Roshanben and Rasidaben) accused under sections 108 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, related to a complainant's daughter's suicide allegedly caused by harassment. The court found prima facie involvement of the accused based on specific allegations in the FIR, and considering the serious nature of charges, preliminary investigation stage, and risk of witness intimidation or evidence tampering, it declined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case