JEMALSING AS JENU SAYSING SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 47/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN200000902026

Filing Number

47/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Additional Court, Visavadar

Judge

1-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

09-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 103(1),54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JEMALSING AS JENU SAYSING SOLANKI

    Adv. N V SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    The 4th Additional Sessions Judge in Visavadar rejected the regular bail application of Jemalsing @ Jenu Saysing Solanki, accused of causing death by strangulation under sections 103(1) and 54 of BNS 2023. The court found prima facie involvement based on FSL reports showing human blood stains on the applicant's clothes and his role in holding the victim's legs, determining that releasing him posed risks of absconding, evidence tampering, and witness intimidation given the grave nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 4th Additional Sessions Judge in Visavadar rejected the regular bail application of Jemalsing @ Jenu Saysing Solanki, accused of causing death by strangulation under sections 103(1) and 54 of BNS 2023. The court found prima facie involvement based on FSL reports showing human blood stains on the applicant's clothes and his role in holding the victim's legs, determining that releasing him posed risks of absconding, evidence tampering, and witness intimidation given the grave nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case