JEMALSING AS JENU SAYSING SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 47/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 09th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN200000902026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

47/2026

Filing Date

02-03-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

02-03-2026

Court

Additional Court, Visavadar

Judge

1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 103(1),54,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

JEMALSING AS JENU SAYSING SOLANKI

Adv. N V SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK

Hearing History

Judge: 1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The 4th Additional Sessions Judge in Visavadar rejected the regular bail application of Jemalsing @ Jenu Saysing Solanki, accused of causing death by strangulation under sections 103(1) and 54 of BNS 2023. The court found prima facie involvement based on FSL reports showing human blood stains on the applicant's clothes and his role in holding the victim's legs, determining that releasing him posed risks of absconding, evidence tampering, and witness intimidation given the grave nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 4th Additional Sessions Judge in Visavadar rejected the regular bail application of Jemalsing @ Jenu Saysing Solanki, accused of causing death by strangulation under sections 103(1) and 54 of BNS 2023. The court found prima facie involvement based on FSL reports showing human blood stains on the applicant's clothes and his role in holding the victim's legs, determining that releasing him posed risks of absconding, evidence tampering, and witness intimidation given the grave nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional Court, Visavadar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case