RAJ BALUBHAI DOBARIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 46/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN200000892026

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

46/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Additional Court, Visavadar

Judge

1-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 482
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(E),116(2),81

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ BALUBHAI DOBARIYA

    Adv. A R THAKOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge at Visavadar granted anticipatory bail to Raj Balubhai Dobariya under Section 482 of BNSS in a Prohibition Act case involving 197 bottles of foreign liquor worth Rs. 57,075. The court found that most investigation was complete, the co-accused was already granted bail, and there was insufficient ground to detain the applicant, especially given his clean criminal record, local residence, and lack of absconding risk. Bail was granted on a surety of Rs. 15,000 with conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with witnesses, and passport surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 46/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The 4th Additional Sessions Judge at Visavadar granted anticipatory bail to Raj Balubhai Dobariya under Section 482 of BNSS in a Prohibition Act case involving 197 bottles of foreign liquor worth Rs. 57,075. The court found that most investigation was complete, the co-accused was already granted bail, and there was insufficient ground to detain the applicant, especially given his clean criminal record, local residence, and lack of absconding risk. Bail was granted on a surety of Rs. 15,000 with conditions including cooperation with investigation, non-tampering with witnesses, and passport surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case