SAILESHGIRI MOHANGIRI MEGHNATHI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 45/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN200000872026

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

Additional Court, Visavadar

Judge

1-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483
Indian Penal Code Section 406.420.144

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAILESHGIRI MOHANGIRI MEGHNATHI

    Adv. S A SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The 4th Additional Sessions Judge at Visavadar granted regular bail to lawyer Shaileshgiri Mohangiri Meghnathi under Section 483 of BNSS, despite his prior absence from court proceedings and issuance of a warrant against him. The court allowed the application as a second chance given his voluntary appearance after learning of the warrant and previous bail compliance, but imposed stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh surety, Rs. 5,000 penalty, restrictions on leaving Gujarat, and mandatory court attendance to ensure trial participation and prevent further delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The 4th Additional Sessions Judge at Visavadar granted regular bail to lawyer Shaileshgiri Mohangiri Meghnathi under Section 483 of BNSS, despite his prior absence from court proceedings and issuance of a warrant against him. The court allowed the application as a second chance given his voluntary appearance after learning of the warrant and previous bail compliance, but imposed stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh surety, Rs. 5,000 penalty, restrictions on leaving Gujarat, and mandatory court attendance to ensure trial participation and prevent further delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case