SAILESHGIRI MOHANGIRI MEGHNATHI vs STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 45/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN200000872026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

45/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

45/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

Additional Court, Visavadar

Judge

1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 406.420.144

Petitioner(s)

SAILESHGIRI MOHANGIRI MEGHNATHI

Adv. S A SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK

Hearing History

Judge: 1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

10-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

HEARING

06-03-2026

HEARING

02-03-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The 4th Additional Sessions Judge at Visavadar granted regular bail to lawyer Shaileshgiri Mohangiri Meghnathi under Section 483 of BNSS, despite his prior absence from court proceedings and issuance of a warrant against him. The court allowed the application as a second chance given his voluntary appearance after learning of the warrant and previous bail compliance, but imposed stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh surety, Rs. 5,000 penalty, restrictions on leaving Gujarat, and mandatory court attendance to ensure trial participation and prevent further delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The 4th Additional Sessions Judge at Visavadar granted regular bail to lawyer Shaileshgiri Mohangiri Meghnathi under Section 483 of BNSS, despite his prior absence from court proceedings and issuance of a warrant against him. The court allowed the application as a second chance given his voluntary appearance after learning of the warrant and previous bail compliance, but imposed stringent conditions including Rs. 1 lakh surety, Rs. 5,000 penalty, restrictions on leaving Gujarat, and mandatory court attendance to ensure trial participation and prevent further delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional Court, Visavadar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case