SANJAYBHAI HARJIBHAI SAKRIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 42/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN200000682026

Filing Number

42/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

42/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Additional Court, Visavadar

Judge

1-4th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 15-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 439(2)
Indian Penal Code Section 306,114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJAYBHAI HARJIBHAI SAKRIYA

    Adv. R B PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The High Court of Gujarat (CRMA S/42/2026) granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a criminal matter while imposing strict conditions. The court directed that the accused surrender before the investigating officer, cooperate fully in the investigation, and not tamper with evidence or witnesses. The bail was conditioned on maintaining good behavior, appearing before the court as required, and complying with all legal procedures without attempting to obstruct justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    4th Addl District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Order

    4th Addl District Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    4th Addl District Judge

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The High Court of Gujarat (CRMA S/42/2026) granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a criminal matter while imposing strict conditions. The court directed that the accused surrender before the investigating officer, cooperate fully in the investigation, and not tamper with evidence or witnesses. The bail was conditioned on maintaining good behavior, appearing before the court as required, and complying with all legal procedures without attempting to obstruct justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case