RAJESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI CHAVADA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK — 41/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483,. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 07th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJJN200000672026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

10-02-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

10-02-2026

Court

Additional Court, Visavadar

Judge

1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

07th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483,
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 109,296(B),326(F),351(2),54,
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) POLICE ACT, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

RAJESHBHAI CHHAGANBHAI CHAVADA

Adv. R B PARMAR

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - V N MADHAK

Hearing History

Judge: 1-4th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

07-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

ORDER

18-02-2026

HEARING

13-02-2026

PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

07-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: CRMA S/41/2026 The court rejected the bail petition of the accused in a criminal case involving serious charges under IPC Sections 143, 149, 325, 326, 354, and other provisions related to a violent assault resulting in death. The court found substantial evidence of premeditated attack using a motorcycle as a weapon, with the accused wielding an iron rod that caused fatal injuries. The court reasoned that releasing the accused would create danger to public safety and witnesses, and no exceptional circumstances existed to warrant bail given the heinous nature of the crime and strong prima facie case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRMA S/41/2026 The court rejected the bail petition of the accused in a criminal case involving serious charges under IPC Sections 143, 149, 325, 326, 354, and other provisions related to a violent assault resulting in death. The court found substantial evidence of premeditated attack using a motorcycle as a weapon, with the accused wielding an iron rod that caused fatal injuries. The court reasoned that releasing the accused would create danger to public safety and witnesses, and no exceptional circumstances existed to warrant bail given the heinous nature of the crime and strong prima facie case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Additional Court, Visavadar All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case