Birenkumar Mansukhlal Gandhi vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 45/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJN160004332025

Filing Number

45/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Birenkumar Mansukhlal Gandhi

    Adv. H V DHORAJIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: REF(T) No. 45/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Birenkumar Mansukhlal Gandhi (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, HR, Grasim Industries Ltd., Indian Rayon Unit, Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement. The worker was terminated on 4/7/2001 without notice but filed the industrial dispute reference 24 years later (2025), exceeding statutory time limits. The court found no "live dispute" and ruled that unexplained delay bars relief under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    For award

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    For Argument of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  11. 31-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  12. 31-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  13. 29-Dec-2025

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 08-Dec-2025

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 01-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 10-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 14-Oct-2025

    For Production of Document

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 13-Oct-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 08-Sep-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 30-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 45/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: REF(T) No. 45/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Birenkumar Mansukhlal Gandhi (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, HR, Grasim Industries Ltd., Indian Rayon Unit, Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement. The worker was terminated on 4/7/2001 without notice but filed the industrial dispute reference 24 years later (2025), exceeding statutory time limits. The court found no "live dispute" and ruled that unexplained delay bars relief under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case