Birenkumar Mansukhlal Gandhi vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 45/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160004332025
Filing Number
45/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2025
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Birenkumar Mansukhlal Gandhi
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 05-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 45/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Birenkumar Mansukhlal Gandhi (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, HR, Grasim Industries Ltd., Indian Rayon Unit, Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement. The worker was terminated on 4/7/2001 without notice but filed the industrial dispute reference 24 years later (2025), exceeding statutory time limits. The court found no "live dispute" and ruled that unexplained delay bars relief under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 45/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Birenkumar Mansukhlal Gandhi (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, HR, Grasim Industries Ltd., Indian Rayon Unit, Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement. The worker was terminated on 4/7/2001 without notice but filed the industrial dispute reference 24 years later (2025), exceeding statutory time limits. The court found no "live dispute" and ruled that unexplained delay bars relief under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts