Miteshkumar B.Pandiya vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 43/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160004312025
Filing Number
43/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2025
Registration No
43/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Miteshkumar B.Pandiya
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 05-03-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 43/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Miteshkumar B. Pandiya (Worker) vs. General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd., Veraval Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's industrial dispute reference filed 24 years after termination from employment on 4/7/2001. The court found the delay unexplained and fatal to the case, holding that raising a dispute after such an inordinate period without sufficient cause violates statutory limitations principles. The reference was ordered dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 43/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Miteshkumar B. Pandiya (Worker) vs. General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd., Veraval Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's industrial dispute reference filed 24 years after termination from employment on 4/7/2001. The court found the delay unexplained and fatal to the case, holding that raising a dispute after such an inordinate period without sufficient cause violates statutory limitations principles. The reference was ordered dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts