Parsotam BhanjoiBahi Savniya vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 41/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160004292025
Filing Number
41/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2025
Registration No
41/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parsotam BhanjoiBahi Savniya
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 05-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 41/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Parsotam Bhanoji Savniya (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, HR, Grasim Industries Ltd., Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement and other relief. The court found that the worker, terminated on 4 July 2001, raised an industrial dispute reference only in 2025—over 24 years later—without providing adequate explanation for the delay. Applying settled legal principles on limitation periods and the requirement for "live disputes," the court held that such inordinate and unexplained delay rendered the reference invalid, barring the worker from claiming reinstatement or other benefits despite the unjustified termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 41/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Parsotam Bhanoji Savniya (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, HR, Grasim Industries Ltd., Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement and other relief. The court found that the worker, terminated on 4 July 2001, raised an industrial dispute reference only in 2025—over 24 years later—without providing adequate explanation for the delay. Applying settled legal principles on limitation periods and the requirement for "live disputes," the court held that such inordinate and unexplained delay rendered the reference invalid, barring the worker from claiming reinstatement or other benefits despite the unjustified termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts