Kirit Bhikhabhai Pathak vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 36/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJN160004242025

Case disposed

Filing Number

36/2025

Filing Date

15-07-2025

Registration No

36/2025

Registration Date

15-07-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

Kirit Bhikhabhai Pathak

Adv. H V DHORAJIYA

Respondent(s)

GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

For award

09-03-2026

For Argument of Second party

05-03-2026

For Evidence of first party

02-03-2026

For Evidence of Second party

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Kirit Bhikhabhai Pathak v. GRASIM Industries Ltd. (REF(T) No. 36/2025) The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement after dismissal in 2001. The worker raised an industrial dispute 24 years later without adequate explanation for the delay. The court found the reference invalid due to unexplained, inordinate delay and held that the worker had waived rights by remaining silent. No relief was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

31-12-2025
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Kirit Bhikhabhai Pathak v. GRASIM Industries Ltd. (REF(T) No. 36/2025) The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement after dismissal in 2001. The worker raised an industrial dispute 24 years later without adequate explanation for the delay. The court found the reference invalid due to unexplained, inordinate delay and held that the worker had waived rights by remaining silent. No relief was granted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case