Jayantkumar D. Fofandi vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 33/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJN160004212025

Filing Number

33/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

33/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayantkumar D. Fofandi

    Adv. H V DHORAJIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Jayantkumar D. Fofandi v. GRASIM Industries Ltd. (REF(T) 33/2025) Decision: The Labour Court allowed the worker's petition for reinstatement with full back wages. The court rejected the employer's defense based on delay in raising the dispute, finding that the worker was justified in awaiting resolution of a pending departmental appeal before filing the industrial dispute. Key Reasoning: The court held that where a worker has filed a departmental appeal that remains unaddressed by management, the worker cannot be penalized for delay in raising an industrial dispute. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court determined the reference was valid despite the time gap, as the dispute was "live" and the delay was attributable to management's inaction rather than worker negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    For award

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    For Argument of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  10. 12-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  11. 31-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  12. 31-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  13. 29-Dec-2025

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 08-Dec-2025

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 01-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 10-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 14-Oct-2025

    For Production of Document

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 13-Oct-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 08-Sep-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 30-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 33/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jayantkumar D. Fofandi v. GRASIM Industries Ltd. (REF(T) 33/2025) Decision: The Labour Court allowed the worker's petition for reinstatement with full back wages. The court rejected the employer's defense based on delay in raising the dispute, finding that the worker was justified in awaiting resolution of a pending departmental appeal before filing the industrial dispute. Key Reasoning: The court held that where a worker has filed a departmental appeal that remains unaddressed by management, the worker cannot be penalized for delay in raising an industrial dispute. Applying Supreme Court precedent, the court determined the reference was valid despite the time gap, as the dispute was "live" and the delay was attributable to management's inaction rather than worker negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case