Jagdish Gordhandas Vadhvana vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 32/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJN160004202025

Filing Number

32/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

32/2025

Registration Date

15-Jul-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH

Judge

1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jagdish Gordhandas Vadhvana

    Adv. H V DHORAJIYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: Jagdish Gordhandas Vadhvana v. General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd. Case No. 32/2025, Labour Court, Junagadh Court Decision: The Labour Court dismissed the worker's reference for reinstatement, holding that the 24-year delay in raising the industrial dispute after termination in 2001 was unexplained and fatal, making the reference invalid under the Industrial Disputes Act. Key Reasoning: The court found no "existing dispute" as required by law, since the worker failed to provide sufficient cause for the inordinate delay and had accepted gratuity benefits in 2005, indicating acquiescence to termination. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court applied the strict doctrine that unexplained delays in raising disputes cannot be condoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    For award

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    For Argument of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    For Evidence of first party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  8. 30-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  9. 12-Jan-2026

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  10. 31-Dec-2025

    OrderView PDF

  11. 31-Dec-2025

    For Evidence of Second party

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  12. 29-Dec-2025

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  13. 08-Dec-2025

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 01-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 10-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 14-Oct-2025

    For Production of Document

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 13-Oct-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 08-Sep-2025

    For Statement of Claim

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 30-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jagdish Gordhandas Vadhvana v. General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd. Case No. 32/2025, Labour Court, Junagadh Court Decision: The Labour Court dismissed the worker's reference for reinstatement, holding that the 24-year delay in raising the industrial dispute after termination in 2001 was unexplained and fatal, making the reference invalid under the Industrial Disputes Act. Key Reasoning: The court found no "existing dispute" as required by law, since the worker failed to provide sufficient cause for the inordinate delay and had accepted gratuity benefits in 2005, indicating acquiescence to termination. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court applied the strict doctrine that unexplained delays in raising disputes cannot be condoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case