Iqbal Alibhai Kabirani vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 28/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJN160004162025

Case disposed

Filing Number

28/2025

Filing Date

15-07-2025

Registration No

28/2025

Registration Date

15-07-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

Iqbal Alibhai Kabirani

Adv. H V DHORAJIYA

Respondent(s)

GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

For award

09-03-2026

For Argument of Second party

05-03-2026

For Evidence of first party

02-03-2026

For Evidence of first party

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

CASE SUMMARY Case 28/2025 - Iqbal Alibhai Kabirani v. General Manager HR, Grasim Industries Ltd. The Labour Court dismissed the worker's claim for reinstatement after finding the dispute was raised 24 years after termination in 2001, with no valid explanation for the extreme delay. The court held that unexplained inordinate delay constitutes a bar to relief under the Industrial Disputes Act, as the dispute becomes stale and ceases to be an "existing dispute." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY Case 28/2025 - Iqbal Alibhai Kabirani v. General Manager HR, Grasim Industries Ltd. The Labour Court dismissed the worker's claim for reinstatement after finding the dispute was raised 24 years after termination in 2001, with no valid explanation for the extreme delay. The court held that unexplained inordinate delay constitutes a bar to relief under the Industrial Disputes Act, as the dispute becomes stale and ceases to be an "existing dispute." This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case