Girishbhai Dasbhai Maru vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 26/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160004142025
Filing Number
26/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2025
Registration No
26/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Girishbhai Dasbhai Maru
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: REF(T) No. 26/2025, Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Girishbhai Dasbhai Maru (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd., Indian Rayon Unit, Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's reference for reinstatement, finding the 24-year delay in raising the industrial dispute after termination on 4 July 2001 fatal and unexplained. The court held that without sufficient cause for the delay and absent any credible reason, the worker cannot revive a stale claim under Industrial Disputes Act principles, dismissing the reference as barred by laches. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: REF(T) No. 26/2025, Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Girishbhai Dasbhai Maru (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd., Indian Rayon Unit, Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's reference for reinstatement, finding the 24-year delay in raising the industrial dispute after termination on 4 July 2001 fatal and unexplained. The court held that without sufficient cause for the delay and absent any credible reason, the worker cannot revive a stale claim under Industrial Disputes Act principles, dismissing the reference as barred by laches. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts