Bharatkumar Kuvargar Meghnathi vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 25/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160004132025
Filing Number
25/2025
Filing Date
15-07-2025
Registration No
25/2025
Registration Date
15-07-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bharatkumar Kuvargar Meghnathi
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary Case: REF(T) No. 25/2025, Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Bharatkumar Kuvargar Meghnathi (Petitioner) v. General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd., Veraval Decision: The court dismissed the reference, holding that the worker's industrial dispute claim was barred by delay. The worker was terminated on 4/7/2001 but raised the dispute only 24 years later without adequate explanation. The court ruled this constituted an "existing dispute" defect under the Industrial Disputes Act, finding the reference invalid on grounds of unexplained, inordinate delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: REF(T) No. 25/2025, Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Bharatkumar Kuvargar Meghnathi (Petitioner) v. General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd., Veraval Decision: The court dismissed the reference, holding that the worker's industrial dispute claim was barred by delay. The worker was terminated on 4/7/2001 but raised the dispute only 24 years later without adequate explanation. The court ruled this constituted an "existing dispute" defect under the Industrial Disputes Act, finding the reference invalid on grounds of unexplained, inordinate delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts