BHAGVANBHAI B SINDHAL vs GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD — 24/2025

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.

REFER T LC - Referance T

CNR: GJJN160004122025

Case disposed

Filing Number

24/2025

Filing Date

15-07-2025

Registration No

24/2025

Registration Date

15-07-2025

Court

LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

BHAGVANBHAI B SINDHAL

Adv. H V DHORAJIYA

Respondent(s)

GENERAL MANAGER, HR, GRASIM IND.LTD., UNIT INDIAN REYON, VERAVAL Advocate - H D RATHOD

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

For award

09-03-2026

For Argument of Second party

02-03-2026

For Evidence of first party

02-02-2026

For Evidence of Second party

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Bhagvanbhai B Sindhal vs General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd. Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's reinstatement claim, finding the industrial dispute reference invalid due to a 24-year delay between his termination (April 2001) and filing the dispute without adequate explanation. The court held that such unexplained delay constitutes waiver of rights, making the dispute "stale" and non-existent under industrial law, and therefore declined to grant relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

31-12-2025
ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bhagvanbhai B Sindhal vs General Manager, HR, GRASIM Industries Ltd. Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's reinstatement claim, finding the industrial dispute reference invalid due to a 24-year delay between his termination (April 2001) and filing the dispute without adequate explanation. The court held that such unexplained delay constitutes waiver of rights, making the dispute "stale" and non-existent under industrial law, and therefore declined to grant relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case