Suleman Mahamad Kalvat vs Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD — 21/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160003252025
Filing Number
21/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
21/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suleman Mahamad Kalvat
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 21/2025 Court Decision: The Labour Court of Junagadh rejected the worker Suleman Mahamad Kalvat's claim for reinstatement and other relief against Grasim Industries Limited (Indian Rayon Unit). The court found the industrial dispute reference invalid due to unexplained 24-year delay between termination (2001) and reference filing. The worker failed to provide adequate justification for the delay, which violated statutory limitation principles under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 21/2025 Court Decision: The Labour Court of Junagadh rejected the worker Suleman Mahamad Kalvat's claim for reinstatement and other relief against Grasim Industries Limited (Indian Rayon Unit). The court found the industrial dispute reference invalid due to unexplained 24-year delay between termination (2001) and reference filing. The worker failed to provide adequate justification for the delay, which violated statutory limitation principles under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts