Dipak Naranbhai Savaniya vs Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD — 20/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160003242025
Filing Number
20/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
20/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dipak Naranbhai Savaniya
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Labour Court dismissed Dipak Naranbhai Savaniya's petition for reinstatement, finding that the worker's 24-year delay in raising an industrial dispute after being terminated on 4 July 2001 was fatal and unexplained. The court held that while the worker had filed a departmental appeal which remained pending, this did not justify raising the dispute in 2025 without clear grounds, and that the reference lacked jurisdiction under Industrial Disputes Act Section 2(k) due to the inordinate delay and absence of a live dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Labour Court dismissed Dipak Naranbhai Savaniya's petition for reinstatement, finding that the worker's 24-year delay in raising an industrial dispute after being terminated on 4 July 2001 was fatal and unexplained. The court held that while the worker had filed a departmental appeal which remained pending, this did not justify raising the dispute in 2025 without clear grounds, and that the reference lacked jurisdiction under Industrial Disputes Act Section 2(k) due to the inordinate delay and absence of a live dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts