Rajendra Yogendrabhai Bhupta vs Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD — 19/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160003232025
Filing Number
19/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
19/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Yogendrabhai Bhupta
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY The Labour Court rejected Rajendra Yogendrabhai Bhupta's industrial dispute claim against Grasim Industries Limited (Indian Rayon unit) regarding his termination on 4 July 2001. The worker failed to establish grounds for reinstatement, as he raised the dispute 24 years later without adequate explanation for the delay, having accepted provident fund settlement in 2005. The court found the reference time-barred under limitation principles and dismissed his claims for back wages and other relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY The Labour Court rejected Rajendra Yogendrabhai Bhupta's industrial dispute claim against Grasim Industries Limited (Indian Rayon unit) regarding his termination on 4 July 2001. The worker failed to establish grounds for reinstatement, as he raised the dispute 24 years later without adequate explanation for the delay, having accepted provident fund settlement in 2005. The court found the reference time-barred under limitation principles and dismissed his claims for back wages and other relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts