Rameshbhai Lakhabhai Galchar vs Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD — 18/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160003222025
Filing Number
18/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
18/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rameshbhai Lakhabhai Galchar
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 18/2025 Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker Rameshbhai Lakhabhai Galchar's claim for reinstatement and backwages following his termination from Grasim Industries (Indian Rayon) in 2001. The court found the industrial dispute reference was barred by delay—the worker filed his case 24 years after dismissal without sufficient explanation, constituting laches under statutory limitation principles. Key Reasoning: Although the worker cited a pending departmental appeal as justification for delay, the court applied established precedent that unexplained inordinate delays bar relief. The court rejected the worker's reinstatement plea, holding the reference invalid on grounds of delay and waiver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 18/2025 Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker Rameshbhai Lakhabhai Galchar's claim for reinstatement and backwages following his termination from Grasim Industries (Indian Rayon) in 2001. The court found the industrial dispute reference was barred by delay—the worker filed his case 24 years after dismissal without sufficient explanation, constituting laches under statutory limitation principles. Key Reasoning: Although the worker cited a pending departmental appeal as justification for delay, the court applied established precedent that unexplained inordinate delays bar relief. The court rejected the worker's reinstatement plea, holding the reference invalid on grounds of delay and waiver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts