Chandankumar Meghjibhai Kansara vs Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD — 17/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160003212025
Filing Number
17/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandankumar Meghjibhai Kansara
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Chandankumar Meghjibhai Kansara v. Grasim Industries Limited (REF(T) No. 17/2025) The Labour Court dismissed the petitioner's claim for reinstatement and back wages following unlawful termination in 2001. The court found the industrial dispute reference invalid due to unexplained 24-year delay in raising the claim, treating the petitioner's silence as waiver of rights under settled precedent that workers must agitate promptly against termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Chandankumar Meghjibhai Kansara v. Grasim Industries Limited (REF(T) No. 17/2025) The Labour Court dismissed the petitioner's claim for reinstatement and back wages following unlawful termination in 2001. The court found the industrial dispute reference invalid due to unexplained 24-year delay in raising the claim, treating the petitioner's silence as waiver of rights under settled precedent that workers must agitate promptly against termination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts