Sanjay Ramfer Shukla vs Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD — 16/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160003202025
Filing Number
16/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
16/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjay Ramfer Shukla
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sanjay Ramfer Shukla v. Grasim Industries Limited Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement and back wages. The court found the industrial dispute reference invalid due to unexplained 24-year delay in raising the claim after termination in 2001, with the worker accepting provident fund settlement in 2005. The court held that no "live dispute" existed and the reference lacked statutory validity under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sanjay Ramfer Shukla v. Grasim Industries Limited Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the worker's claim for reinstatement and back wages. The court found the industrial dispute reference invalid due to unexplained 24-year delay in raising the claim after termination in 2001, with the worker accepting provident fund settlement in 2005. The court held that no "live dispute" existed and the reference lacked statutory validity under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts