Rakeshgiri Shantigiri Meghnathi vs Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD — 14/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160003182025
Filing Number
14/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
14/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rakeshgiri Shantigiri Meghnathi
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
Grasim Industries Limited, Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 14/2025 Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the petitioner's (Rakeshgiri Shantigiri Meghnathi's) claim for reinstatement and other reliefs against Grasim Industries Limited (Unit Indian Rayon). The Court found the industrial dispute reference was barred by delay—the worker raised the dispute 24 years after termination in 2001 without adequate explanation, violating the requirement of a "live dispute" under industrial law. The reference was deemed invalid and the case was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 14/2025 Court Decision: The Labour Court rejected the petitioner's (Rakeshgiri Shantigiri Meghnathi's) claim for reinstatement and other reliefs against Grasim Industries Limited (Unit Indian Rayon). The Court found the industrial dispute reference was barred by delay—the worker raised the dispute 24 years after termination in 2001 without adequate explanation, violating the requirement of a "live dispute" under industrial law. The reference was deemed invalid and the case was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts