Kamleshgiri Shivgiri Goswami vs Grasim Industries Limited Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD — 10/2025
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160003142025
Filing Number
10/2025
Filing Date
19-06-2025
Registration No
10/2025
Registration Date
19-06-2025
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamleshgiri Shivgiri Goswami
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
Grasim Industries Limited Unit Indian Reyon Advocate - H D RATHOD
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Evidence of Second party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-02-2026 | For Evidence of Second party |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 10/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Petitioner: Kamleshgiri Shivgiri Goswami Respondent: Grasim Industries Limited (Indian Rayon Unit) Decision The court directed that the petitioner be reinstated to his position at Grasim Industries with full back wages and benefits, finding the termination from April 2001 to be illegal. The court rejected the respondent company's objection based on delay in raising the dispute, holding that the worker's long wait for departmental appeal decision justified the reference and that the company's inaction cannot penalize the employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 10/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Petitioner: Kamleshgiri Shivgiri Goswami Respondent: Grasim Industries Limited (Indian Rayon Unit) Decision The court directed that the petitioner be reinstated to his position at Grasim Industries with full back wages and benefits, finding the termination from April 2001 to be illegal. The court rejected the respondent company's objection based on delay in raising the dispute, holding that the worker's long wait for departmental appeal decision justified the reference and that the company's inaction cannot penalize the employee. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts