ARVINDBHAI KANJIBHAI SUYANI vs INDIAN RAYON AND INDUSTRIES (GRASIM INDUSTRIES) VERAVAL Advocate - Y C RAJYAGURU — 4/2025

JudegementView PDF

Case Summary: REF(T) No. 04/2025 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Arvindbhai Kanjibhai Suyani (Petitioner) v. Indian Rayon and Industries (Grasim Industries), Veraval Decision: The Labour Court REJECTED the petitioner's industrial dispute reference, finding no "existing dispute" exists due to an unexplained 24-year delay. The worker was terminated in June 2001 but filed the reference only in 2025, with no adequate explanation for the inordinate delay. Citing limitation law principles and Supreme Court precedent, the court held that without sufficient cause to explain such prolonged inaction, the dispute became stale and cannot be entertained under the Industrial Disputes Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For award

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Argument of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of first party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Evidence of Second party

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

For Reply of opponent

Judge, Labour Court

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 4/2025