SHAIKH FIROZBHAI HUSENBHAI vs MAHASAGAR TRAVELS, KALWA CHOWK, JUNAGADH-362001 Advocate - R H DHAMANI — 15/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160001412024
Filing Number
15/2024
Filing Date
28-Mar-2024
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
28-Mar-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAIKH FIROZBHAI HUSENBHAI
Adv. J M HALEPOTRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAHASAGAR TRAVELS, KALWA CHOWK, JUNAGADH-362001 Advocate - R H DHAMANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
Judegement
SUMMARY The Labour Court of Junagadh held that petitioner Shaikh Firozbhai Husenbhai, a driver employed by Mahasagar Travels from March 1, 2014, was illegally terminated on April 3, 2023, without following due process under the Industrial Disputes Act. The court found the employer's dismissal violated statutory procedures and ordered reinstatement with backwages for the 240-day period of continuous service during which the worker remained unemployed. The employer failed to provide any substantive defense or evidence contradicting the worker's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Apr-2026
For award
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Apr-2026
For award
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Apr-2026
For award
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Apr-2026
For Argument of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Mar-2026
For Argument of Second party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Mar-2026
For Argument of Second party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Mar-2026
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Feb-2026
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Jan-2026
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Dec-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
01-Dec-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
03-Nov-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Oct-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
08-Sep-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
13-Aug-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
06-Aug-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
16-Jul-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
07-Jul-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
11-Jun-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-May-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Apr-2025
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-Apr-2025
For Other evidence of Applicant
Judge, Labour Court
-
01-Apr-2025
For Evidence of Second party
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Second party
Judge, Labour Court
-
04-Mar-2025
For Evidence of Second party
Judge, Labour Court
-
05-Feb-2025
For Evidence of Second party
Judge, Labour Court
-
06-Jan-2025
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
16-Dec-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
07-Dec-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Nov-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-Sep-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
20-Aug-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Aug-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
09-Jul-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
19-Jun-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
03-Jun-2024
For Reply of opponent
Judge, Labour Court
-
18-May-2024
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
08-May-2024
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court
-
12-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2024
SUMMARY The Labour Court of Junagadh held that petitioner Shaikh Firozbhai Husenbhai, a driver employed by Mahasagar Travels from March 1, 2014, was illegally terminated on April 3, 2023, without following due process under the Industrial Disputes Act. The court found the employer's dismissal violated statutory procedures and ordered reinstatement with backwages for the 240-day period of continuous service during which the worker remained unemployed. The employer failed to provide any substantive defense or evidence contradicting the worker's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts