SHAIKH FIROZBHAI HUSENBHAI vs MAHASAGAR TRAVELS, KALWA CHOWK, JUNAGADH-362001 Advocate - R H DHAMANI — 15/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th April 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160001412024
Filing Number
15/2024
Filing Date
28-03-2024
Registration No
15/2024
Registration Date
28-03-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAIKH FIROZBHAI HUSENBHAI
Adv. J M HALEPOTRA
Respondent(s)
MAHASAGAR TRAVELS, KALWA CHOWK, JUNAGADH-362001 Advocate - R H DHAMANI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For award
For award
For Argument of first party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | For award |
| 13-04-2026 | For award |
| 08-04-2026 | For award |
| 06-04-2026 | For Argument of first party |
Final Orders / Judgements
SUMMARY The Labour Court of Junagadh held that petitioner Shaikh Firozbhai Husenbhai, a driver employed by Mahasagar Travels from March 1, 2014, was illegally terminated on April 3, 2023, without following due process under the Industrial Disputes Act. The court found the employer's dismissal violated statutory procedures and ordered reinstatement with backwages for the 240-day period of continuous service during which the worker remained unemployed. The employer failed to provide any substantive defense or evidence contradicting the worker's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY The Labour Court of Junagadh held that petitioner Shaikh Firozbhai Husenbhai, a driver employed by Mahasagar Travels from March 1, 2014, was illegally terminated on April 3, 2023, without following due process under the Industrial Disputes Act. The court found the employer's dismissal violated statutory procedures and ordered reinstatement with backwages for the 240-day period of continuous service during which the worker remained unemployed. The employer failed to provide any substantive defense or evidence contradicting the worker's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts