M.M.CHUDASAMA, Govt.Labour Officer and Minimum Wages Act, Porbandar vs SAURASHTRA CHEMICALS OF NIRMA LTD., PORBANDAR Advocate - P D MANDAVIA — 9/2022
Case under The Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Section 21(1)1. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN160000232022
Filing Number
9/2022
Filing Date
29-01-2022
Registration No
9/2022
Registration Date
29-01-2022
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M.M.CHUDASAMA, Govt.Labour Officer and Minimum Wages Act, Porbandar
Adv. na
Respondent(s)
SAURASHTRA CHEMICALS OF NIRMA LTD., PORBANDAR Advocate - P D MANDAVIA
S.V.SONARA(Director), Saurashta Chemical Division, porbandar ,
Adv. P D MANDAVIA
PRAKASHBHAI PATEL
Adv. J M MEHTA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | PLEA |
| 25-02-2026 | PLEA |
| 18-02-2026 | PLEA |
| 20-01-2026 | PLEA |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C No. 09/2022 The Labour Court found the respondents (Saurashtra Chemicals of Nirma Ltd. and associated individuals) guilty of violating minimum wages provisions under the Payment of Wages Act and Minimum Wages Act. The court convicted them and imposed a fine of ₹63,000, with an additional one month simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remained unpaid. The judgment upheld the labour officer's prosecution case based on evidence of wage violations against workers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C No. 09/2022 The Labour Court found the respondents (Saurashtra Chemicals of Nirma Ltd. and associated individuals) guilty of violating minimum wages provisions under the Payment of Wages Act and Minimum Wages Act. The court convicted them and imposed a fine of ₹63,000, with an additional one month simple imprisonment as alternative punishment if the fine remained unpaid. The judgment upheld the labour officer's prosecution case based on evidence of wage violations against workers. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts