Ramabhai Babubhai Galchar vs General Manegar,Grasim Industries ltd.Unit Off Indian Reyon ,Veraval Advocate - Y C RAJYAGURU — 3/2026
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160000142026
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
08-01-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
08-01-2026
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramabhai Babubhai Galchar
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
General Manegar,Grasim Industries ltd.Unit Off Indian Reyon ,Veraval Advocate - Y C RAJYAGURU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Statement of Claim
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 05-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Statement of Claim |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 03/2026 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Ramabhai Babubhai Galchar (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, Grasim Industries Ltd., Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court admitted the industrial dispute reference, finding that the worker's 24-year delay in raising the dispute was justified because he had pending departmental appeals that remained unaddressed by management. The court rejected the management's contention that the delay rendered the reference invalid, holding that workers cannot be penalized for management's inaction on appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 03/2026 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Ramabhai Babubhai Galchar (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, Grasim Industries Ltd., Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court admitted the industrial dispute reference, finding that the worker's 24-year delay in raising the dispute was justified because he had pending departmental appeals that remained unaddressed by management. The court rejected the management's contention that the delay rendered the reference invalid, holding that workers cannot be penalized for management's inaction on appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts