Ramabhai Babubhai Galchar vs General Manegar,Grasim Industries ltd.Unit Off Indian Reyon ,Veraval Advocate - Y C RAJYAGURU — 3/2026
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160000142026
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
08-Jan-2026
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramabhai Babubhai Galchar
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.General Manegar,Grasim Industries ltd.Unit Off Indian Reyon ,Veraval Advocate - Y C RAJYAGURU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 03/2026 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Ramabhai Babubhai Galchar (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, Grasim Industries Ltd., Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court admitted the industrial dispute reference, finding that the worker's 24-year delay in raising the dispute was justified because he had pending departmental appeals that remained unaddressed by management. The court rejected the management's contention that the delay rendered the reference invalid, holding that workers cannot be penalized for management's inaction on appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
12-Mar-2026
For award
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
09-Mar-2026
For Argument of Second party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
05-Mar-2026
For Evidence of first party
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Mar-2026
For Statement of Claim
Judge, Labour Court (Jd)
-
02-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2026
Case Summary: REF(T) No. 03/2026 Court: Labour Court, Junagadh Parties: Ramabhai Babubhai Galchar (Petitioner) vs. General Manager, Grasim Industries Ltd., Veraval (Respondent) Decision: The Labour Court admitted the industrial dispute reference, finding that the worker's 24-year delay in raising the dispute was justified because he had pending departmental appeals that remained unaddressed by management. The court rejected the management's contention that the delay rendered the reference invalid, holding that workers cannot be penalized for management's inaction on appeals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts