Altaf A satar Panja vs General Manegar,Grasim Industries ltd.Unit Off Indian Reyon ,Veraval Advocate - Y C RAJYAGURU — 2/2026
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th March 2026.
REFER T LC - Referance T
CNR: GJJN160000132026
Filing Number
2/2026
Filing Date
07-01-2026
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
07-01-2026
Court
LABOUR COURT, JUNAGADH
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Altaf A satar Panja
Adv. H V DHORAJIYA
Respondent(s)
General Manegar,Grasim Industries ltd.Unit Off Indian Reyon ,Veraval Advocate - Y C RAJYAGURU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT (JD)
Disposed
For award
For Argument of Second party
For Evidence of first party
For Statement of Claim
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | For award |
| 09-03-2026 | For Argument of Second party |
| 05-03-2026 | For Evidence of first party |
| 02-03-2026 | For Statement of Claim |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Altaf A Satar Panja v. General Manager, Grasim Industries Ltd. Court Decision: The Labour Court of Junagadh dismissed the petitioner's request for reinstatement to his position at Grasim Industries. The court found that while the worker raised a dispute 24 years after his termination in 2001, the delay itself was not sufficient to invalidate the industrial dispute reference, as the worker had been pursuing departmental appeals that remained unaddressed by management during this period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Altaf A Satar Panja v. General Manager, Grasim Industries Ltd. Court Decision: The Labour Court of Junagadh dismissed the petitioner's request for reinstatement to his position at Grasim Industries. The court found that while the worker raised a dispute 24 years after his termination in 2001, the delay itself was not sufficient to invalidate the industrial dispute reference, as the worker had been pursuing departmental appeals that remained unaddressed by management during this period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts