THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KISHAN URFE KISHALO LAKHAMANBHAI CHANABHAI CHUDASAMA Advocate - D K PITRODA — 749/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN120011972025
Filing Number
749/2025
Filing Date
20-12-2025
Registration No
749/2025
Registration Date
20-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203070250451
Police Station
VISAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KISHAN URFE KISHALO LAKHAMANBHAI CHANABHAI CHUDASAMA Advocate - D K PITRODA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 31-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.NO. 749/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused of copper wire theft charges under IPC Section 303(2), 54, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the theft crime, as no witness directly observed the alleged theft, and the testimony of police witnesses and panchas (village elders) who signed statements lacked credibility regarding their knowledge of the theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.NO. 749/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused of copper wire theft charges under IPC Section 303(2), 54, finding insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the theft crime, as no witness directly observed the alleged theft, and the testimony of police witnesses and panchas (village elders) who signed statements lacked credibility regarding their knowledge of the theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts