SAURASHTRA GRAMIN BANK VISAVADAR BRANCH vs CHAMPABEN HARIBHAI DOMADIYA Advocate - A D DAVE — 90/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 6,9,26. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN120009592024
Filing Number
90/2024
Filing Date
13-08-2024
Registration No
90/2024
Registration Date
13-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAURASHTRA GRAMIN BANK VISAVADAR BRANCH
Adv. D M SHAH
Respondent(s)
CHAMPABEN HARIBHAI DOMADIYA Advocate - A D DAVE
SANJAYBHAI HARIBHAI DOMADIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 09-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 07-02-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 01-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The National Court of Gujarat dismissed the plaintiff's suit, finding that a settlement (Vidro-Purssis) had already been reached between the parties and there was no valid reason to proceed further with the claim. The court ordered the refund of court fees to the plaintiff and directed issuance of a certificate accordingly. The judgment was pronounced on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The National Court of Gujarat dismissed the plaintiff's suit, finding that a settlement (Vidro-Purssis) had already been reached between the parties and there was no valid reason to proceed further with the claim. The court ordered the refund of court fees to the plaintiff and directed issuance of a certificate accordingly. The judgment was pronounced on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts