MAHENDRA URFE MENDO JORUBHAI VALA vs THE STATE OF GUJRAT Advocate - APP — 44/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJJN120002692026
Filing Number
44/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
44/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203070250324
Police Station
VISAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAHENDRA URFE MENDO JORUBHAI VALA
Adv. A D DAVE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJRAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CRMA-44/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petition and rejected the petitioner's request for bail/land release. The accused (Mahendra Urfe Mendo Jorubhai Vala) was accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65(f), 65(c), and 81 for alleged liquor-related offenses. The court found the charge serious given approximately 300 liters of illicit liquor involved and ruled the accused cannot be released on bail, considering the gravity of the offense, public interest, and potential for reoffending. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that releasing the accused without strict conditions would encourage similar crimes and threaten public peace and social harmony, particularly regarding alcohol-related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2026
Case Summary: CRMA-44/2026 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate dismissed the petition and rejected the petitioner's request for bail/land release. The accused (Mahendra Urfe Mendo Jorubhai Vala) was accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act sections 65(f), 65(c), and 81 for alleged liquor-related offenses. The court found the charge serious given approximately 300 liters of illicit liquor involved and ruled the accused cannot be released on bail, considering the gravity of the offense, public interest, and potential for reoffending. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that releasing the accused without strict conditions would encourage similar crimes and threaten public peace and social harmony, particularly regarding alcohol-related offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts