ANUPBHAI BHARATBHAI BHALIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 28/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 06th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJJN120001892026
Filing Number
28/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
28/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANUPBHAI BHARATBHAI BHALIYA
Adv. V K JETHAVA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Summary The court granted bail to the accused under Section 438 of CrPC in a case involving charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the accused to be a family man with local residence and property, with no criminal history, and determined that the offense was bailable. Bail was granted on conditions including depositing ₹25,000, furnishing a surety bond of ₹50,000, and ensuring court attendance at all proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 28/2026
Summary The court granted bail to the accused under Section 438 of CrPC in a case involving charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found the accused to be a family man with local residence and property, with no criminal history, and determined that the offense was bailable. Bail was granted on conditions including depositing ₹25,000, furnishing a surety bond of ₹50,000, and ensuring court attendance at all proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts