SAURASHTRA NAGARIK SHARAFI SAHKARI MANDALI LIMI. BAGASARA-VISAVADAR BRANCH vs GIRDHARBHAI GOPALBHAI NAKRANI Advocate - U B DEHIMA — 56/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN120000942026

Filing Number

56/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

56/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAURASHTRA NAGARIK SHARAFI SAHKARI MANDALI LIMI. BAGASARA-VISAVADAR BRANCH

    Adv. K B JOSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GIRDHARBHAI GOPALBHAI NAKRANI Advocate - U B DEHIMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court ordered the accused to pay the bail check amount to the complainant as no grounds remain to continue proceedings against the accused under Section 12 of the relevant statute. The judgment was delivered on 14th March 2026 by the Judicial Magistrate First Class in a case involving a criminal matter, with the court finding insufficient cause to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 56/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court ordered the accused to pay the bail check amount to the complainant as no grounds remain to continue proceedings against the accused under Section 12 of the relevant statute. The judgment was delivered on 14th March 2026 by the Judicial Magistrate First Class in a case involving a criminal matter, with the court finding insufficient cause to proceed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case