SAURASHTRA NAGARIK SHARAFI SAHKARI MANDALI LIMI. BAGASARA-BHESAN BRANCH vs RATILAL MOHANBHAI RAKHOLIYA — 47/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN120000802026
Filing Number
47/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
47/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAURASHTRA NAGARIK SHARAFI SAHKARI MANDALI LIMI. BAGASARA-BHESAN BRANCH
Adv. K B JOSHI
Respondent(s)
RATILAL MOHANBHAI RAKHOLIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
| 17-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Gujarat court dismissed a criminal case (Visavdar GJ01522) dated March 14, 2026, finding no grounds to proceed against the accused after the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case regarding criminal charges. The court ordered that since the accused had already paid the disputed amount and there was insufficient evidence, the case should be closed with costs imposed on the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Gujarat court dismissed a criminal case (Visavdar GJ01522) dated March 14, 2026, finding no grounds to proceed against the accused after the complainant failed to establish a prima facie case regarding criminal charges. The court ordered that since the accused had already paid the disputed amount and there was insufficient evidence, the case should be closed with costs imposed on the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts