THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HUSENBHAI AAMADBHAI SAMA Advocate - U B DEHIMA — 11/2026

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 28th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN120000212026

Case disposed

Filing Number

11/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203070240256

Police Station

VISAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

PUBLIC GAMBLING ACT, 1867 [SECTION 1 18] Section 12

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HUSENBHAI AAMADBHAI SAMA Advocate - U B DEHIMA

FARUKBHAI ISHABHAI HALEPUTRA

PRAVINBHAI BHIKHUBHAI MAKWANA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

28-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

11-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted three defendants charged under IPC Section 12 (educated person committing offense) in a case involving alleged possession of cannabis and confiscated money during a police raid in Viramgam, Gujarat. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of credible independent witness evidence and procedural irregularities in the police investigation, resulting in acquittal under Section 271(1) of CrPC 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted three defendants charged under IPC Section 12 (educated person committing offense) in a case involving alleged possession of cannabis and confiscated money during a police raid in Viramgam, Gujarat. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of credible independent witness evidence and procedural irregularities in the police investigation, resulting in acquittal under Section 271(1) of CrPC 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case