THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs HUSENBHAI AAMADBHAI SAMA Advocate - U B DEHIMA — 11/2026
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN120000212026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
06-Jan-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
06-Jan-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203070240256
Police Station
VISAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.HUSENBHAI AAMADBHAI SAMA Advocate - U B DEHIMA
-
2.FARUKBHAI ISHABHAI HALEPUTRA
-
3.PRAVINBHAI BHIKHUBHAI MAKWANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted three defendants charged under IPC Section 12 (educated person committing offense) in a case involving alleged possession of cannabis and confiscated money during a police raid in Viramgam, Gujarat. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of credible independent witness evidence and procedural irregularities in the police investigation, resulting in acquittal under Section 271(1) of CrPC 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2026
Summary The court acquitted three defendants charged under IPC Section 12 (educated person committing offense) in a case involving alleged possession of cannabis and confiscated money during a police raid in Viramgam, Gujarat. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to lack of credible independent witness evidence and procedural irregularities in the police investigation, resulting in acquittal under Section 271(1) of CrPC 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts