THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs MUKESHBHAI MANGUBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - K B JOSHI — 4/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN120000142026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

4/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203070240153

Police Station

VISAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI MANGUBHAI SOLANKI Advocate - K B JOSHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Mukeshbhai Mangubhai Solanki The court acquitted the accused Mukeshbhai Mangubhai Solanki of charges under IPC Section 135 (breach of public proclamation/arms ban) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the case conclusively, particularly regarding witness credentiality and procedural gaps in the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Plea

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Mukeshbhai Mangubhai Solanki The court acquitted the accused Mukeshbhai Mangubhai Solanki of charges under IPC Section 135 (breach of public proclamation/arms ban) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the case conclusively, particularly regarding witness credentiality and procedural gaps in the FIR. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case