THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KANUBHAI MEPABHAI SONDARVA Advocate - K B JOSHI — 3/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN120000132026

Case disposed

Filing Number

3/2026

Filing Date

06-01-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

06-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203070250449

Police Station

VISAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

KANUBHAI MEPABHAI SONDARVA Advocate - K B JOSHI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

25-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

25-02-2026

PLEA

16-02-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

30-01-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: Case 3/2026 Court Decision: The defendant Kanubhai Mepabhai Sondarva was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 for illegal possession of a steel knife with a 6-inch blade. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt, particularly due to insufficient witness corroboration and gaps in the investigation record. Key Reasoning: While the complainant's testimony established that the defendant was found carrying a weapon near Visavadar railway station, critical evidentiary deficiencies undermined the case—notably, the panchanama (formal inspection document) lacked properly identified independent witnesses, and the investigating officer's testimony could not adequately supplement these gaps. The court determined the prosecution did not meet the required standard of proof for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Case 3/2026 Court Decision: The defendant Kanubhai Mepabhai Sondarva was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 for illegal possession of a steel knife with a 6-inch blade. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt, particularly due to insufficient witness corroboration and gaps in the investigation record. Key Reasoning: While the complainant's testimony established that the defendant was found carrying a weapon near Visavadar railway station, critical evidentiary deficiencies undermined the case—notably, the panchanama (formal inspection document) lacked properly identified independent witnesses, and the investigating officer's testimony could not adequately supplement these gaps. The court determined the prosecution did not meet the required standard of proof for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case