THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs KANUBHAI MEPABHAI SONDARVA Advocate - K B JOSHI — 3/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN120000132026
Filing Number
3/2026
Filing Date
06-01-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
06-01-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VISAVADAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203070250449
Police Station
VISAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
KANUBHAI MEPABHAI SONDARVA Advocate - K B JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
PLEA
WARRANT OF ARREST
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 25-02-2026 | PLEA |
| 16-02-2026 | WARRANT OF ARREST |
| 30-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Case 3/2026 Court Decision: The defendant Kanubhai Mepabhai Sondarva was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 for illegal possession of a steel knife with a 6-inch blade. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt, particularly due to insufficient witness corroboration and gaps in the investigation record. Key Reasoning: While the complainant's testimony established that the defendant was found carrying a weapon near Visavadar railway station, critical evidentiary deficiencies undermined the case—notably, the panchanama (formal inspection document) lacked properly identified independent witnesses, and the investigating officer's testimony could not adequately supplement these gaps. The court determined the prosecution did not meet the required standard of proof for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case 3/2026 Court Decision: The defendant Kanubhai Mepabhai Sondarva was acquitted of charges under Gujarat Police Act Section 135 for illegal possession of a steel knife with a 6-inch blade. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the offense beyond reasonable doubt, particularly due to insufficient witness corroboration and gaps in the investigation record. Key Reasoning: While the complainant's testimony established that the defendant was found carrying a weapon near Visavadar railway station, critical evidentiary deficiencies undermined the case—notably, the panchanama (formal inspection document) lacked properly identified independent witnesses, and the investigating officer's testimony could not adequately supplement these gaps. The court determined the prosecution did not meet the required standard of proof for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts