NIRALIBEN D./O. KAMLESHBHAI BORICHANGAR vs RAHULBHAI YOGESHBHAI MAHETA Advocate - J L THUMMAR — 112/2025
Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 21. Disposed: Contested--DISMISS WITH NO ORDER TO COST on 01st June 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJJN110007952025
Filing Number
115/2025
Filing Date
23-12-2025
Registration No
112/2025
Registration Date
23-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHESAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISS WITH NO ORDER TO COST
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NIRALIBEN D./O. KAMLESHBHAI BORICHANGAR
Adv. S R DODIYA
Respondent(s)
RAHULBHAI YOGESHBHAI MAHETA Advocate - J L THUMMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 26-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 19-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
| 07-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF APPLICANT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the mother's independent application seeking custody of her 9-year-old daughter under Section 21 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act as legally unmaintainable, holding that Section 21 permits only temporary custody orders as interim relief within a main proceeding under Section 12, not as standalone applications. However, the court granted the mother liberty to file a fresh interim application for temporary custody within the pending main Section 12 proceeding, ensuring procedural compliance while protecting her substantive rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the mother's independent application seeking custody of her 9-year-old daughter under Section 21 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act as legally unmaintainable, holding that Section 21 permits only temporary custody orders as interim relief within a main proceeding under Section 12, not as standalone applications. However, the court granted the mother liberty to file a fresh interim application for temporary custody within the pending main Section 12 proceeding, ensuring procedural compliance while protecting her substantive rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts