Government of Gujarat vs Hiteshbhai Ranchodbhai Kyada Advocate - V V RANVA — 565/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(K),323,506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN110007082024
Filing Number
565/2024
Filing Date
27-09-2024
Registration No
565/2024
Registration Date
27-09-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHESAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203007240239
Police Station
BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Hiteshbhai Ranchodbhai Kyada Advocate - V V RANVA
Manjulaben w/o Ranchod Bhimjibhai Kyada
Adv. V V RANVA
Ranchodbhai Bhimjibhai Kyada
Adv. V V RANVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 18-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Judicial Magistrate, First Class (JMFC) Court of Mehsana acquitted three accused persons in a cruelty case under the Indian Penal Code. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges of cruelty against a woman and her child with sufficient credible evidence; the testimony of witnesses lacked consistency and reliability, and crucial medical evidence did not corroborate the claims of physical violence. The court emphasized that the quality of evidence, not quantity of witnesses, determines guilt, and acquitted all three accused for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Judicial Magistrate, First Class (JMFC) Court of Mehsana acquitted three accused persons in a cruelty case under the Indian Penal Code. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges of cruelty against a woman and her child with sufficient credible evidence; the testimony of witnesses lacked consistency and reliability, and crucial medical evidence did not corroborate the claims of physical violence. The court emphasized that the quality of evidence, not quantity of witnesses, determines guilt, and acquitted all three accused for lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts